https://theworldfinancialforum.com/participate/
U.S. migrants
U.S. and Rwanda have agreed for the African country to potentially accept hundreds of migrants deported from the U.S., the spokesperson for the Rwandan government and an official told Reuters, as President Donald Trump’s administration takes a hardline approach toward immigration.
The agreement, under which Rwanda would accept up to 250 migrants, was signed by U.S. and Rwandan officials in Kigali in June, said the Rwandan official, speaking on condition of anonymity, adding that Washington had already sent an initial list of 10 people to be vetted.
“Rwanda has agreed with the United States to accept up to 250 migrants, in part because nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement, and our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation,” said the spokesperson for the Rwandan government, Yolande Makolo.
“Under the agreement, Rwanda has the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement. Those approved will be provided with workforce training, healthcare, and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade.”
The White House and State Department had no immediate comment. The Department of Homeland Security referred questions to the State Department.
President Donald Trump aims to deport millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally and his administration has sought to ramp up removals to third countries, including sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland.
Rwanda has in recent years positioned itself as a destination country for migrants that Western countries would like to remove, despite concerns by rights groups that Kigali does not respect some of the most fundamental human rights.
In May, the foreign minister said Rwanda was in the early stages of talks to receive immigrants deported from the United States.
The Trump administration argues that third-country deportations help swiftly remove some migrants, including those with criminal convictions. Immigration hardliners see third-country removals as a way to deal with offenders who cannot easily be deported and could pose a threat to the public.
Opponents have criticized the deportations as dangerous and cruel, since people could be sent to countries where they could face violence, have no ties and do not speak the language.
The Trump administration has pressed countries to take migrants. It deported more than 200 Venezuelans accused of being gang members to El Salvador in March, where they were jailed until they were released in a prisoner swap last month.
Call of supreme court
The Supreme Court in June allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries without giving them a chance to show they could be harmed. But the legality of the removals is being contested in a federal lawsuit in Boston, U.S. a case that could potentially wind its way back to the conservative-leaning high court.
Rwanda signed an agreement with Britain in 2022 to take in thousands of asylum seekers, a deal that was scrapped last year by then newly-elected Prime Minister Keir Starmer. No one was sent to Rwanda under the plan because of years of legal challenges.
In a significant development, Rwanda has confirmed a new agreement with the U.S. to host up to 250 migrants as part of a broader international effort to manage migration flows. The announcement, made by the Rwandan government on Monday, reflects growing cooperation between the East African nation and the United States in addressing global humanitarian concerns.
According to Rwandan officials, the deal is aimed at offering protection and resettlement to migrants who may be vulnerable or stuck in legal limbo. Most of these migrants are expected to come from conflict-affected regions, although specific nationalities have not yet been disclosed. The U.S. will reportedly fund the relocation and integration process, which includes housing, education, and healthcare support in Rwanda.
This isn’t Rwanda’s first time stepping into a humanitarian role on the global stage. The country has previously worked with UN agencies to host asylum seekers evacuated from Libyan detention centers. Rwanda’s leadership has often promoted the nation as a stable and safe destination, especially for those fleeing persecution or war.
The U.S., on the other hand, has faced mounting pressure to find humane and effective ways to deal with rising migration challenges. This new partnership with Rwanda is seen as part of a larger strategy to share responsibility with willing nations and reduce the strain on its own borders and processing systems.
Critics, however, have raised concerns about whether third-country agreements truly address the root causes of migration or simply shift responsibility. Nevertheless, both Rwanda and the U.S. have stated that the deal is grounded in humanitarian principles and mutual respect.
As global migration becomes increasingly complex, such bilateral deals may represent a growing trend in how countries like Rwanda and the US cooperate on international refugee and migration policy.