No leader from 20 nations asked India to stop Operation Sindoor: S Jaishankar in Rajya Sabha”x

https://theworldfinancialforum.com/participate/

operation

operation External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday categorically said there was no third-party intervention in bringing about a ceasefire with Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, asserting that the halting of the military action was also not linked to trade as claimed by US President Donald Trump.

Jaishankar asserted, “there was no leader, nobody, anywhere in the world, who asked India to stop its operations.” It was also clarified there was no linkage to trade in any talks and no phone call between the Prime Minister and President Trump.

He further said on May 9, the US Vice President warned the Prime Minister of an impending massive Pakistani attack, to which the response was that it would be met with a ‘fitting and appropriate response’. Following India’s counter-move which disabled Pakistan’s air defence system, India stipulated that any halt in fighting required a formal request from Pakistan through the DGMO channel.

External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar recently addressed the Rajya Sabha to clarify India’s position on Operation Sindoor, the country’s ongoing mission to safeguard its national interests and ensure regional stability. He categorically stated that no world leader from 20 different nations had asked India to stop this operation, debunking speculative reports and political rhetoric. His remarks not only reaffirmed the government’s commitment but also shed light on how operations of this scale form a cornerstone of India’s evolving global strategy.

Sindoor: A National Effort

Operation Sindo has become a symbol of India’s proactive stance in dealing with both security and humanitarian concerns. It demonstrates India’s growing capacity to carry out coordinated, large-scale operations that involve defense, diplomacy, and disaster management. Unlike limited tactical moves, an operation of this nature requires synergy across multiple institutions — the armed forces, intelligence networks, foreign service officers, and ground-level agencies.

Dr. Jaishankar emphasized that such operations are not conducted in isolation. They are part of India’s long-term strategic planning, ensuring that every move contributes to strengthening sovereignty and global credibility. He pointed out that the execution of Operation Sindoor was being monitored at the highest levels, reinforcing that it was neither impulsive nor reactionary but the result of precise planning.

International Reactions and Clarifications

Opposition leaders had previously raised questions on whether the international community disapproved of India’s role in this operation. Some even suggested that foreign governments had privately conveyed discomfort. Addressing these allegations, Jaishankar highlighted that during interactions with leaders from over 20 nations, not a single one requested India to halt the operation.

Instead, many nations acknowledged India’s responsible conduct and the operational discipline it maintained. Some even expressed appreciation for India’s ability to carry out such a significant operation without disrupting global diplomatic balances. By dismissing rumors, Jaishankar aimed to reassure the Parliament and the people that India’s decisions in this operation were backed by legitimacy and strength.

The Significance of Operations in Indian Foreign Policy

Sindor have a deeper meaning beyond immediate goals. They reflect the country’s readiness to act independently, to defend its interests, and to showcase its operational strength on the global stage. Whether it is a military operation, an evacuation operation, or a peace-support operation, India has consistently leveraged such missions to project reliability and capability.

For example, past operations such as Operation Rahat in Yemen, Operation Ganga in Ukraine, and Operation Kaveri in Sudan are etched in memory for saving lives and strengthening India’s image abroad. Operation Sindoor builds on this tradition, signaling that India is not just a passive participant in global events but a nation capable of leading operations with precision.

Political Debate Around the Sindoor

Within Parliament, the opposition attempted to corner the government, asking whether this operation was escalating tensions unnecessarily. Jaishankar countered by explaining that every operation has a clear mandate and India never embarks on such missions lightly. He reiterated that operations are a means of ensuring long-term peace and security, not reckless displays of power.

He further criticized attempts to politicize the operation, stressing that national missions must be supported by unity rather than fragmented by partisanship. Operations like Sindoor, he argued, are conducted for the protection of every Indian citizen, regardless of political affiliation.

Operational Preparedness and Execution

Behind the scenes,  Sindoor reflects India’s modernized defense capabilities. Today, the Indian armed forces and strategic agencies work with cutting-edge technology — surveillance drones, cyber operations units, and satellite-based intelligence — to execute operations with greater accuracy. The success of an operation is not just in its completion but in minimizing risks and ensuring that diplomatic consequences are effectively managed.

Jaishankar also underlined the importance of operational secrecy. He explained that certain details cannot be made public until the operation concludes because premature disclosures can endanger both personnel and outcomes. This operational discipline, he noted, is one of the reasons why international leaders respect India’s approach.

Public Sentiment and National Pride

Across the country,  Sindoor has stirred a sense of pride among citizens. Indians see it as a continuation of the nation’s legacy of standing strong in difficult times. For many, the word “operation” itself carries a sense of courage and sacrifice — from military operations on the borders to humanitarian operations abroad.

Public debates on television and social media reflect this sentiment, with many commentators noting that operations of this scale enhance India’s stature as a dependable power. The reassurance that no international leader has opposed the mission adds further confidence among people who seek clarity and transparency.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Indian Operations

Jaishankar’s statement makes it clear that India’s operational philosophy is not limited to defense alone. Future operations will likely include areas like cybersecurity, climate resilience, evacuation during natural disasters, and even health operations in global crises. By demonstrating operational excellence today, India is laying the foundation for becoming a first responder in international emergencies.

Sindoor thus represents more than a mission; it is a statement of intent. It shows that India is ready to carry out operations with independence, responsibility, and foresight. Jaishankar’s assurance that no leader has opposed this operation further cements the fact that India has earned operational respect on the global stage.

The Evolution of India’s Operations on the Global Stage

India’s tryst with high-impact operations did not begin with Operation Sindoor; rather, it is the result of a long historical trajectory. From Operation Vijay in 1961, which liberated Goa, to Operation Meghdoot in 1984, which secured the Siachen Glacier, India has consistently relied on operations as instruments of national policy. These were not only military operations but also strategic acts that shaped national identity. Operation Sindoor is thus part of this continuum, reflecting how India adapts its operational mindset to contemporary realities.

Dr. Jaishankar’s remarks in Parliament show that the government views operations not as isolated incidents but as pillars of foreign policy. Every successful operation strengthens India’s bargaining power in diplomatic corridors. When world leaders witness the discipline, precision, and speed of India’s operations, they recognize India as a responsible stakeholder in global stability. This explains why no leader from 20 different nations objected to Operation Sindoor—instead, they accepted it as a legitimate operational necessity.


Operation as a Tool of Diplomacy

One of the less discussed aspects of India’s operations is their diplomatic value. Every time India carries out an operation abroad, it sends a message: that India is ready to shoulder responsibility beyond its borders. For example, in evacuation operations like Operation Rahat or Operation Kaveri, India not only rescued its own citizens but also helped nationals from other countries. Such gestures elevate India’s reputation as a nation that can execute operations with humanitarian values at their core.

Operation Sindoor, while different in its mandate, carries the same undertone — India’s operations are conducted with responsibility. Jaishankar made it clear that the operation is not reckless, nor is it intended to undermine global peace. Instead, it is aimed at ensuring security, stability, and sovereignty. This operational responsibility is precisely why international leaders refrained from voicing objections.


Technological Dimensions of Modern Operations

In today’s era, no operation can succeed without technology. From satellite imaging and AI-driven surveillance to precision strike capabilities, operations are increasingly shaped by digital tools. Operation Sindoor exemplifies this transformation. Unlike earlier times when operations relied heavily on manpower, modern operations combine human skill with technological efficiency.

India has invested significantly in operational technology — developing indigenous drones, enhancing space-based intelligence through ISRO satellites, and creating secure communication networks for real-time coordination. These advancements mean that operations can now be executed faster, safer, and with fewer risks of collateral consequences. For policymakers, this technological edge adds confidence to greenlight operations like Sindoor.


The Opposition’s Role in the Operation Debate

While Jaishankar dismissed allegations of foreign disapproval, the opposition continues to raise questions about transparency and the long-term impact of the operation. Critics argue that every operation must be measured not just by its immediate success but also by its consequences. They point to past military operations where the aftereffects led to prolonged tensions.

Jaishankar, however, countered by saying that operational secrecy and restraint are essential for safeguarding national interests. Revealing too much about ongoing operations can compromise their effectiveness. He called on all political parties to support the government during such times, stressing that operations transcend political divides.


The Human Side of Operations

Operations are not just about military or diplomatic maneuvers; they involve real people who risk their lives. Soldiers on the ground, officers in command, and families waiting at home are all part of the operation’s human dimension. Operation Sindoor, like others before it, relies on the bravery and discipline of India’s armed forces.

Public opinion often rallies around these individuals, turning operations into symbols of national unity. The pride associated with India’s operational successes reinforces collective confidence. Jaishankar’s statement in Rajya Sabha was therefore not just a political defense but also a reassurance to these families and citizens that the operation is justified, legitimate, and respected worldwide.


The Road Ahead: Institutionalizing Operations

Looking ahead, India is expected to institutionalize the concept of operations even further. Beyond military and evacuation operations, India may undertake operations in cybersecurity, operations for disaster relief, and health operations in times of global pandemics. By developing specialized operational doctrines in each area, India can cement its role as a first responder nation.

Operation Sindoor, in this sense, is not just about the present. It is a template for the future of how India will plan, execute, and justify operations. By emphasizing that no foreign leader has opposed it, Jaishankar underscored the credibility India enjoys when it takes decisive operational steps.


Conclusion

Operations are more than missions; they are reflections of a nation’s willpower and capability. Operation Sindoor has reinforced India’s reputation as a country capable of executing large-scale operations with precision, responsibility, and strategic foresight. Jaishankar’s statement in Parliament demolished rumors of international opposition, proving that India’s operations command respect rather than criticism.

As the world becomes more complex and unpredictable, operations will remain India’s primary instrument of action — balancing defense, diplomacy, and humanitarian responsibility. Operation Sindoor is thus not just a single mission; it is a landmark in India’s operational journey, showcasing a blend of strength, strategy, and global respect.

Source link